🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," commented the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various figures to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more measured tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this global discussion continues, the steps of this nation and others show that states globally are increasingly content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.